The Effect of Incentives in Nonroutine Analytical Team Tasks: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP13226

Authors: Florian Englmaier; Stefan Grimm; David Schindler; Simeon Schudy

Abstract: Despite the prevalence of non-routine analytical team tasks in modern economies, little is known about how incentives influence performance in these tasks. In a field experiment with more than 3000 participants, we document a positive effect of bonus incentives on the probability of completion of such a task. Bonus incentives increase performance due to the reward rather than the reference point (performance threshold) they provide. The framing of bonuses (as gains or losses) plays a minor role. Incentives improve performance also in an additional sample of presumably less motivated workers. However, incentives reduce these workers' willingness to "explore" original solutions.

Keywords: team work; bonus incentives; loss; gain; nonroutine; exploration

JEL Codes: C92; C93; J33; D03; M52


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
reward component of the bonus (J33)performance improvements (D29)
framing of bonus (J33)performance outcomes (L25)
incentives (M52)willingness to explore original solutions (O36)
incentives (M52)willingness to explore original solutions (student teams) (O36)
bonus incentives (M52)team performance (M54)
bonus incentives (M52)probability of completing the task within 45 minutes (C41)

Back to index