Working Paper: NBER ID: w9853
Authors: Daniel S. Hamermesh; Amy M. Parker
Abstract: Adjusted for many other determinants, beauty affects earnings; but does it lead directly to the differences in productivity that we believe generate earnings differences? We take a large sample of student instructional ratings for a group of university professors, acquire six independent measures of their beauty and a number of other descriptors of them and their classes. Instructors who are viewed as better looking receive higher instructional ratings, with the impact of a move from the 10th to the 90th percentile of beauty being substantial. This impact exists within university departments and even within particular courses, and is larger for male than for female instructors. Disentangling whether this outcome represents productivity or discrimination is, as with the issue generally, probably impossible.
Keywords: beauty; instructional ratings; pedagogical productivity
JEL Codes: J7; I2
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| professors' beauty (A14) | instructional ratings (A20) |
| moving from the 10th to the 90th percentile of beauty (D63) | instructional ratings (A20) |
| beauty (Y60) | positive responses from students (C90) |
| minority faculty members (J15) | lower ratings (G24) |
| non-native English speakers (J82) | lower ratings (G24) |
| beauty (Y60) | higher evaluations (C52) |