Working Paper: NBER ID: w9539
Authors: David W. Galenson
Abstract: There have been two very different life cycles for important modern artists: some, including Picasso, have made their greatest contributions early in their careers, whereas others, like C‚zanne, have produced their best work late in their lives. Art's young geniuses have worked deductively to make conceptual innovations, while its old masters have worked inductively, to innovate experimentally. These two life cycles emerge from quantitative analysis of a wide range of evidence, and recognizing the differences between them allows a new understanding of a number of issues in art history. The two life cycles are furthermore not limited to painting, for the association between deduction and early achievement, and that between induction and late creativity, also clearly appear in quantitative studies of the careers of important economists and poets. Understanding the careers of modern artists therefore leads to a deeper understanding of the life cycles of human creativity in general.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: J4
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| age (J14) | early artistic achievement (Y60) |
| age (J14) | late-life creativity (J26) |
| type of innovation (O35) | timing of significant contributions (C41) |
| experimental artists (Z11) | gradual improvement over time (C41) |
| conceptual artists (Z11) | sudden breakthroughs (O36) |