Economic Development as Self-Discovery

Working Paper: NBER ID: w8952

Authors: Ricardo Hausmann; Dani Rodrik

Abstract: In the presence of uncertainty about what a country can be good at producing, there can be great social value to discovering costs of domestic activities because such discoveries can be easily imitated. We develop a general-equilibrium framework for a small open economy to clarify the analytical and normative issues. We highlight two failures of the laissez-faire outcome: there is too little investment and entrepreneurship ex ante, and too much production diversification ex post. Optimal policy consists of counteracting these distortions: to encourage investments in the modern sector ex ante, but to rationalize production ex post. We provide some informal evidence on the building blocks of our model.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: O0; L1


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
quality of policymaking in Latin America improved in the 1990s (O54)economic growth remained disappointingly low (O49)
inadequate incentives for entrepreneurship to discover new production costs (D24)economic growth remained disappointingly low (O49)
reforms increased market mobility (J62)reduced incentives to invest in new activities (E22)
government-provided rents through trade protection and subsidies (R38)stimulated the cost discovery process in successful Asian economies (O53)
lack of appropriability of cost discoveries (D23)undermines incentives for entrepreneurs to invest in discovering production capabilities (O31)
reforms of the 1980s and 1990s did not adequately address the need for spurring investment in nontraditional activities (E69)economic growth remained disappointingly low (O49)
government-provided rents without accompanying policies to rationalize industries (R38)could backfire (G41)

Back to index