Can Equity and Efficiency Complement Each Other?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w8820

Authors: Rebecca M. Blank

Abstract: Economists tend to assume that redistributive transfers increase equity but cause a loss in efficiency, the so-called 'leaky bucket' effect. This paper explores situations where efficiency losses are small or where equity and efficiency might even complement each other. A simple model identifies key parameters that cause leaky buckets and which policy can affect. Three situations are discussed where the equity/efficiency tradeoff may be low: When transfers go to populations with no capacity to change their behavior; when transfers go to programs that limit efficiency losses through behavioral requirements; and when commodities are subsidized that function as long-term investments and create future income gains.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: D3; I3; H3


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
government transfers aimed at increasing equity (H53)inefficiencies (D61)
transfers to populations with no capacity to change their behavior (J11)minimize equity-efficiency tradeoff (D61)
transfers linked to programs that limit efficiency losses (F16)minimize equity-efficiency tradeoff (D61)
subsidized commodities as long-term investments (Q02)minimize equity-efficiency tradeoff (D61)

Back to index