How Migration Restrictions Limit Agglomeration and Productivity in China

Working Paper: NBER ID: w8707

Authors: Chunchung Au; Vernon Henderson

Abstract: China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and urban areas, with resulting first order losses in GDP. For urban areas the paper estimates a city productivity relationship, based on city GDP numbers for 1990-97. The effects of access, educational attainment, FDI, and public infrastructure on productivity are estimated. Worker productivity is shown to be an inverted U-shape function of city employment level, with the peak point shifting out as industrial composition moves from manufacturing to services. As far as we know this is the first paper to actually estimate the relationship between output per worker and city scale, as it varies with industrial composition. The majority of Chinese cities are shown to be potentially undersized - below the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval about the size where their output per worker peaks. The paper calculates the large gains from increased agglomeration in both the rural industrial and urban sectors. It also examines the effect of capital reallocations, where the rural sector is grossly undercapitalized.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: J600; O100; O400; P200; R100; R200; R300


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
migration restrictions (F22)labor surplus in agriculture (J43)
migration restrictions (F22)insufficient agglomeration of economic activity (R11)
insufficient agglomeration of economic activity (R11)GDP losses (F69)
educational attainment (I21)productivity levels (O49)
FDI (F23)productivity levels (O49)
public infrastructure (H54)productivity levels (O49)
city employment levels (J68)worker productivity (J29)
city employment levels (J68)inverted U-shape function of worker productivity (J29)
industrial composition transition (L16)peak of worker productivity (J29)
increased agglomeration (R11)potential gains in productivity (O49)
undercapitalization in rural sector (Q14)capital reallocations necessary (E22)

Back to index