Ohlin versus Stolper-Samuelson

Working Paper: NBER ID: w7641

Authors: Douglas A. Irwin

Abstract: This paper examines Bertil Ohlin's analysis of trade policy and factor rewards in the context of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century United States. A leading question of the day was whether labor could benefit from protection. Ohlin suspected that labor could benefit from protection and his writings helped spawn the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, which was different from but consistent with Ohlin's approach. This paper seeks to find evidence on whether U.S. tariffs on imported labor-intensive manufactures helped enhance the income of labor at the expense of capital and land. The answer is unclear: vastly different conclusions arise from a calibrated general equilibrium Ohlin-style model and a factor content of trade calculation indirect evidence from lobbying and voting patterns over the tariff are also ambiguous.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: F13; F16; N71


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
U.S. tariffs on imported labor-intensive manufactures (F66)enhance labor income (J89)
tariff interventions (F13)factor price responses (L11)
protection (D18)labor benefits (J32)
tariffs on goods produced with little capital and much manual labor (F16)labor could gain (J59)

Back to index