How Wide is the Scope of Holdup-Based Theories? Contractual Form and Market Thickness in Trucking

Working Paper: NBER ID: w7347

Authors: Thomas N. Hubbard

Abstract: How far do the contractual implications of hold-up-based theories (Klein, Crawford, and Alchian (1978), Williamson (1979, 1985)) extend? I investigate this in the context of trucking. Quasi-rents in trucking are generally smaller than in the contexts studied in the previous empirical literature. They vary with hauls' distance and the thickness of local markets. I find that doubling the thickness of the market increases the likelihood that simple spot arrangements govern transactions by about 30% for long hauls. I find weaker evidence of relationships between local market thickness and contractual form for short hauls -- hauls for which quasi-rents are particularly small. Contracts' role as protectors of quasi-rents becomes less important as quasi-rents decrease, but exists over a surprisingly large range.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: L22; L42


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Local market thickness (D40)Use of simple spot arrangements (long hauls) (L93)
Local market thickness (D40)Use of long-term contracts (long hauls) (L90)
Doubling local market thickness (D40)Use of simple spot arrangements (long hauls) (L93)
Local market thickness (D40)Use of simple spot arrangements (short hauls) (R41)
Local market thickness (D40)Use of long-term contracts (short hauls) (L90)
Quasirents (R33)Choice of contractual arrangements (L14)

Back to index