Why Clashes Between Internal and External Stability Goals End in Currency Crises 1797-1994

Working Paper: NBER ID: w5710

Authors: Michael D. Bordo; Anna J. Schwartz

Abstract: We argue that recent currency crises reflect clashes between fundamentals and pegged exchange rates, just as did crises in the past. We reject the view that crises reflect self-fulfilling prophecies that are not closely related to measured fundamentals. Doubts about the timing of a market attack on a currency are less important than the fact that it is bound to happen if a government's policies are inconsistent with pegged exchange rates. We base these conclusions on a review of currency crises in the historical record under metallic monetary regimes and of crises post-World War II under Bretton Woods, and since, in European and Latin American pegged exchange rate regimes.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: No JEL codes provided


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
domestic monetary policy (E52)currency crisis (F31)
misalignment between government policies and pegged exchange rates (F31)speculative attacks (D84)
market expectations (D84)currency crisis (F31)
domestic credit expansion (E51)currency crisis (F31)
past experiences (C92)current market expectations (D84)

Back to index