The Economic Reality of the Beauty Myth

Working Paper: NBER ID: w4521

Authors: Susan Averett; Sanders Korenman

Abstract: We investigate income, marital status, and hourly pay differentials by body mass (kg/m2) in a sample of 23 to 31 year olds drawn from the 1988 NLSY. Obese women have lower family incomes than women whose weight-for-height is in the 'recommended' range. Results for men are weaker and mixed. We find similar results when we compare same-sex siblings in order to control for family background (e.g., social class) differences. Differences in economic status by body mass for women increase markedly when we use an earlier weight measure or restrict the sample to persons who were single and childless when the early weight was reported. There is some evidence of labor market discrimination against obese women. However, differences in marriage probabilities and in spouse's earnings account for 50 to 95 percent of their lower economic status. There is no evidence that obese African American women suffer an economic penalty relative to other African American women.

Keywords: Body Mass Index; Economic Outcomes; Obesity; Labor Market; Discrimination

JEL Codes: I12; J31; J71


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
body mass index (BMI) (I14)family income (D31)
obesity (I12)family income (D31)
obesity (I12)marriage probabilities (J12)
marriage probabilities (J12)family income (D31)
obesity (I12)labor market discrimination (J70)
economic status (P46)weight gain (I15)
body mass index (BMI) (I14)hourly wages (J31)
body mass index (BMI) (I14)marital status (J12)
body mass index (BMI) (I14)economic outcomes (F61)

Back to index