The Impact of Collective Bargaining Legislation on Disputes in the US Public Sector: No Policy May Be the Worst Policy

Working Paper: NBER ID: w3978

Authors: Janet Currie; Sheena McConnell

Abstract: This paper estimates the impact of collective bargaining legislation on disputes during labor negotiations in the U.S. public sector. We use a large national sample of U.S. state and local government contracts to compare the incidence and intensity of disputes by similar workers under different forms of collective bargaining legislation. The breadth of our data allows us to examine the impact of five different forms of legislation. Our principal finding is that strike costs, measured by strike duration and the number of working days lost, are highest in jurisdictions that provide no explicit framework for bargaining or dispute resolution.

Keywords: collective bargaining; public sector; labor disputes; legislation

JEL Codes: J52; J53


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
no explicit framework for collective bargaining (J58)highest strike costs (J52)
no duty to bargain (J52)greater incidence and intensity of disputes (D74)
mandatory bargaining and arbitration procedures (J52)lower strike costs (L11)

Back to index