Working Paper: NBER ID: w3928
Authors: Daniel S. Hamermesh
Abstract: Markets that involve customers waiting for services or goods in queues whose length they cannot observe are studied. In these markets suppliers truncate queues that become so long that they jeopardize the supplier's future relations with the customer. The length of the queue and the probability of truncation increase with the quality of the supplier, and this implicitly defines the price that customers are willing to pay for quality. Queue-jumping or nontruncation can occur if monetary payments are made or if nonmonetary specific commitments exist between a customer and a supplier. The predictions apply to any activity where the queue is unobservable and transactions costs make contracts or spot pricing uneconomic. The theory is examined on a random sample of refereeing requests by seven economics journals. Quality, measured by experience and citations to the referee's work, lengthens the queue and increases the probability of truncation. Monetary bribes affect queue discipline in the expected way; and specific commitments, measured by past publication in the journal and location at the editor's institution, greatly affect the truncation rate, but have no impact on the rate of servicing the queue. The implications for truncation are also examined on a set of data describing doctors' willingness to accept new patients, with much the same results as in the sample of referees.
Keywords: queue management; service quality; commitment; refereeing; healthcare
JEL Codes: J22; I11
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
higher quality suppliers (L15) | longer queues (C69) |
higher quality suppliers (L15) | higher refusal rates (J79) |
monetary bribes (E42) | reduced waiting times (C41) |
monetary bribes (E42) | reduced refusal rates (C83) |
specific commitments (F53) | lower waiting times (C41) |
specific commitments (F53) | lower probability of denial into the queue (C69) |
higher quality suppliers (L15) | increased probabilities of truncation (C24) |