Do Institutional Investors Destabilize Stock Prices? Evidence on Herding and Feedback Trading

Working Paper: NBER ID: w3846

Authors: Josef Lakonishok; Andrei Shleifer; Robert W. Vishny

Abstract: This paper uses a new data set of quarterly portfolio holdings of 769 all-equity pension funds between 1985 and 1989 to evaluate the potential effect of their trading on stock prices. We address two aspects of trading by money managers: herding, which refers to buying (selling) the same stocks as other managers buy (sell) at the same time; and positive-feedback trading, which refers to buying winners and selling losers. These two aspects of trading are commonly a part of the argument that institutions destabilize stock prices. At the level of individual stocks at quarterly frequencies, we find no evidence of substantial herding or positive-feedback trading by pension fund managers, except in small stocks. Also, there is no strong cross-sectional correlation between changes in pension funds' holdings of a stock and its abnormal return.

Keywords: institutional investors; herding; feedback trading; stock prices; pension funds

JEL Codes: G14; G23


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Institutional investors do not substantially herd or engage in positive-feedback trading (G23)Stock price stability (G19)
Institutional trading does not drive price movements (D47)Changes in pension funds' holdings of a stock (G23)
Herding in smaller stocks (C92)Price instability (E31)
Positive feedback trading in smaller stocks (G41)Price instability (E31)
Weak correlation between institutional excess demand and price change (E39)Price movements (G13)

Back to index