Working Paper: NBER ID: w31565
Authors: Caroline Fry; Megan MacGarvie
Abstract: Online platforms such as preprint servers have become an important way to disseminate new scientific knowledge prior to peer review. However, little is known about how attention to preprints may vary across authors from different countries of origin, particularly relative to evaluation in expert-controlled systems such as scientific journals. This study explores how readers allocated attention across preprints in the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic, a time when there was an increase in demand for new research and a corresponding increase in the use of preprint platforms around the world. We find that, after controlling carefully for article quality and topic as well as the prominence of the preprint’s ultimate publication outlet, preprints with authors from Chinese institutions receive less attention, and preprints with authors from U.S. institutions receive more attention, than preprints with authors from the rest of the world. In an exploration of potential mechanisms driving the observed effects, we find evidence that when evaluation is more constrained, in terms of lack of knowledge or expertise and increase in time pressure, audiences tend to make greater use of preprint authors’ country of origin as a proxy for quality or relevance. The results suggest that geographic biases may persist or even be exacerbated on platforms designed to promote unfettered access to early research findings.
Keywords: COVID-19; preprints; open science; knowledge diffusion; geographic bias
JEL Codes: O31; O33; O36
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Chinese-authored preprints (C59) | less attention (D91) |
| US-authored preprints (Y30) | more attention (Z00) |
| audience's ability to evaluate research constrained (C90) | reliance on country of origin as proxy for quality (L15) |
| Asian ethnicity names in the US (J15) | less attention (D91) |
| Chinese-authored preprints (C59) | biases against Chinese preprints (J15) |