Working Paper: NBER ID: w3152
Authors: Assaf Razin; Efraim Sadka
Abstract: In a world economy there are two types of distortions which can be caused by capital income taxation in addition to the standard closed-economy wedge between the consumer-saver marginal intertemporal rate of substitution and the producer-investor marginal productivity of capital: (i)international differences in intertemporal marginal rates of substitution, implying an inefficient allocation of world savings across countries; and (ii) international differences in the marginal productivity of capital, implying an inefficient allocation of world investment across countries. The paper focuses on the structure of taxation for countries which are engaged in tax competition and on potential gains from s tax harmonization. We show that if the competing countries are sufficiently coordinated with the rest of the world then tax competition leads each country to apply the residence principle of taxation and there are no gains from tax harmonization. If, however there is not sufficient coordination,tax competition leads to low capital income taxes and the tax burden falls on the internationally immobile factors. The outcome is nevertheless still efficient relative to the available constrained set of tax instruments.
Keywords: Tax Competition; Tax Harmonization; Capital Income Taxation
JEL Codes: H25; F23
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| sufficient coordination (P11) | no gains from tax harmonization (H29) |
| insufficient coordination (P11) | tax burden falls on immobile factors (H22) |
| low capital income taxes (H24) | tax burden falls on immobile factors (H22) |
| tax competition leads to efficient outcomes under the residence principle (H21) | efficient allocation of capital (G31) |
| tax rates influence investment and savings (H32) | capital allocation (G31) |