How Replaceable is a Low-Wage Job?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w31447

Authors: Evan K. Rose; Yotam Shemtov

Abstract: We study the long-run consequences of losing a low-wage job using linked employer-employee wage records and household surveys. For full-time workers earning $15 per hour or less, job loss due to an idiosyncratic, firm-wide contraction generates a 13% reduction in earnings six years later and over $40,000 cumulative lost earnings. Most of the long-run decrease stems from reductions in employment and hours as opposed to wage rates: job losers are twice as likely to report being unemployed and looking for work. By contrast, workers initially earning $15-$30 per hour see comparable long-run earnings losses driven primarily by reductions in hourly wages. Calibrating a dynamic job ladder model to the estimates implies that the rents from holding a full-time $15 per hour job relative to unemployment are worth about $20,000, more than seven times monthly earnings.

Keywords: low-wage job; job loss; earnings; employment outcomes

JEL Codes: J01; J64


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
job loss due to an idiosyncratic firm-wide contraction (J63)long-run earnings reduction (J31)
job loss due to an idiosyncratic firm-wide contraction (J63)reductions in employment (J63)
reductions in employment (J63)long-run earnings reduction (J31)
job loss due to an idiosyncratic firm-wide contraction (J63)declines in hours worked (J22)
declines in hours worked (J22)long-run earnings reduction (J31)
job loss due to an idiosyncratic firm-wide contraction (J63)likelihood of being unemployed (J64)
job loss (J63)probability of job separation (J63)
probability of job separation (J63)declines in employment (J63)
job loss (J63)likelihood of zero earnings for two or more years (C41)

Back to index