Identification of Nonadditive Fixed Effects Models: Is the Return to Teacher Quality Homogeneous?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w31384

Authors: Jinyong Hahn; John D. Singleton; Nee Yildiz

Abstract: Panel or grouped data are often used to allow for unobserved individual heterogeneity in econometric models via fixed effects. In this paper, we discuss identification of a panel data model in which the unobserved heterogeneity both enters additively and interacts with treatment variables. We present identification and estimation methods for parameters of interest in this model under both strict and weak exogeneity assumptions. The key identification insight is that other periods' treatment variables are instruments for the unobserved fixed effects. We apply our proposed estimator to matched student-teacher data used to estimate value-added models of teacher quality. We show that the common assumption that the return to unobserved teacher quality is the same for all students is rejected by the data. We also present evidence that No Child Left Behind-era school accountability increased the effectiveness of teacher quality for lower performing students.

Keywords: teacher quality; fixed effects models; heterogeneity; panel data; No Child Left Behind

JEL Codes: C12; C14; C31; C36; C52; H75; I21; I24


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
unobserved heterogeneity (C21)treatment variables (C32)
treatment variables (C32)outcomes (P47)
teacher quality (A21)student performance (D29)
accountability pressures (H83)effectiveness of teacher quality (A21)
No Child Left Behind policy (I28)test scores (C52)

Back to index