Working Paper: NBER ID: w31334
Authors: Jeremy Atack; Robert A. Margo; Paul Rhode
Abstract: The long-standing view in US economic history is the shift in manufacturing in the nineteenth century from the artisan shop to the mechanized factory led to “labor deskilling.” Craft workers were displaced by mix of semi-skilled operatives, unskilled workers, and a reduced force of mechanics to maintain the powered machines. Investigating the Department of Labor’s 1899 Hand and Machine Labor Study using causal inference statistical techniques, we show the adoption of inanimate power did indeed induce deskilling. While the effects were statistically significant, they accounted for only 7-15 percent of the deskilling observed in the sample. Broadening the scope of our inquiry, we find the increased division of labor as captured by the increase in scale of operations and the ratio of workers to tasks accounts for a larger fraction.
Keywords: deskilling; mechanization; labor; manufacturing
JEL Codes: J23; N61; O31
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| division of labor (L23) | deskilling (F66) |
| mechanization (L64) | division of labor (L23) |
| mechanization (L64) | deskilling (F66) |