Mandatory Seatbelt Laws and Traffic Fatalities: A Reassessment

Working Paper: NBER ID: w30851

Authors: D. Mark Anderson; Yang Liang; Joseph J. Sabia

Abstract: Using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for the period 1983-1997, Cohen and Einav (Review of Economics and Statistics 2003; 85(4): 828–843) found that mandatory seatbelt laws were associated with a 4 to 6 percent reduction in traffic fatalities among motor vehicle occupants. After successfully replicating their two-way fixed effects estimates, we (1) add 22 years of data (1998-2019) to capture additional seatbelt policy variation and observe a longer post-treatment period, (2) employ the interaction-weighted estimator proposed by Sun and Abraham (2021) to address potential bias due to heterogeneous and dynamic treatment effects, and (3) estimate event-study models to investigate pre-treatment trends and explore lagged post-treatment effects. Consistent with Cohen and Einav (2003), our updated estimates show that primary seatbelt laws are associated with a 5 to 9 percent reduction in fatalities among motor vehicle occupants. Estimated effects of secondary seatbelt laws are smaller in magnitude and sensitive to model choice.

Keywords: seatbelt laws; traffic fatalities; public safety; policy assessment

JEL Codes: I12; K32; K42


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Primary seatbelt laws (PSLs) (R48)Reduction in fatalities among motor vehicle occupants (R48)
Secondary seatbelt laws (SSLs) (R48)Effect on fatalities (J17)
Primary seatbelt laws (PSLs) (R48)Significant decline in occupant fatality rates (J17)
Mandatory seatbelt laws (R48)Non-occupant traffic fatalities (R48)

Back to index