Pros and Cons of Globalization: Income-Based Attitudes

Working Paper: NBER ID: w30713

Authors: Assaf Razin

Abstract: Which income group is pro-globalization or anti-globalization—the wealthy skilled-labor or the poor low-skilled labor? How globalization affect income-based attitudes towards globalization? The paper addresses these issues in the framework of a small open economy which trades in goods and financial securities with the rest of the world. Income-based political cleavages analyzed are grounded on trade-related and macro-related fundamentals, familiar from a standard open-economy model. They are: (i) The degree of trade border frictions, (ii) The degree of international finance frictions, (iii) The relative factor abundance that determines the capital intensity of the country’s exports; and, (iv) The domestic savings and productivity of domestic investment, which determines whether the country is a financial capital exporter or importer.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: F00; F1; F30


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
globalization (F60)income-based attitudes (P46)
wealthy skilled labor class (J24)pro-globalization (F69)
poor low-skilled labor class (F66)anti-globalization (F69)
trade border frictions (F55)attitudes of different income groups (D31)
international finance frictions (F39)attitudes of different income groups (D31)
globalization (F60)distribution of income (D31)
globalization (F60)generosity of the welfare state (I38)
higher trade globalization (F69)reallocation of income (E25)
reallocation of income (E25)benefits to capital owners (P12)
reallocation of income (E25)decline in labor shares (E25)

Back to index