Working Paper: NBER ID: w30542
Authors: Hector Chade; Victoria R. Marone; Amanda Starc; Jeroen Swinkels
Abstract: We study a general screening model that encompasses the problem facing a price-setting insurer offering vertically differentiated contracts to consumers with multiple dimensions of private information. We show how even with minimal assumptions on consumer valuations and costs, progress can be made to understand the solution in two ways. First, we derive conditions that any optimal menu must satisfy, and show how they can be used to shed light on insurer incentives. Second, we propose a tractable method to approximate the solution, and show how the quality of the approximation can be ex-post evaluated in any practical application. Applying our method empirically in the context of health insurance, we find that the approximation comes within one percent of the true solution. We illustrate the usefulness of the approximation for understanding the solution graphically as well as for numerically evaluating optimal policy interventions in a monopoly market. Our analysis highlights the importance of strategic insurer responses and endogenous contract characteristics in evaluating the effects of policy in these markets.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: I11
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| insurer's menu design (G52) | consumer choices (D10) |
| insurer's menu design (G52) | welfare outcomes (I38) |
| insurer objectives (L21) | consumer outcomes (G52) |
| contract limits (K12) | consumer welfare (D69) |
| monopolist insurer (L12) | exclusion of consumers (D16) |
| quasiconcavity in consumer preferences (D11) | simpler problem (C69) |
| finite contract sets (D86) | continuum of contracts (L14) |