The Quality of Lower Track Education: Evidence from Britain

Working Paper: NBER ID: w30174

Authors: Damon Clark

Abstract: For much of the 20th century, British students were tracked into higher-track (for the "top" 20%) or lower-track (for the rest) secondary schools. Opponents of tracking contend that the lower-track schools in these systems will inevitably provide low-quality education. In this paper I examine this claim using a 1947 reform that increased the minimum school leaving age from 14 to 15. First, I show that over 95% of the students affected by the reform ("compliers") attended lower-track schools. Second, using new data, I show that for both men and women, the additional schooling induced by the reform had close to zero impact on a range of labor market outcomes including earnings. Third, I show that lower-track schools featured, among other things, large classes and a curriculum that promoted practical education. I conclude that my findings shed new light on the potential consequences of educational tracking.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: I21; J24; J31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
larger class sizes (A21)lack of impact on labor market outcomes (F66)
less qualified teachers (I24)lack of impact on labor market outcomes (F66)
curriculum focused on practical education (A21)lack of impact on labor market outcomes (F66)
lower student effort due to weak incentives (D29)lack of impact on labor market outcomes (F66)
additional schooling induced by the reform (J24)labor market outcomes (J48)
additional schooling induced by the reform (J24)earnings (J31)
additional schooling induced by the reform (J24)labor force participation (J22)
additional schooling induced by the reform (J24)home ownership (R21)

Back to index