Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications

Working Paper: NBER ID: w30059

Authors: Zefeng Chen; Zhengyang Jiang; Hanno Lustig; Stijn van Nieuwerburgh; Mindy Z. Xiaolan

Abstract: We study three centuries of U.K. fiscal history. Before WW-I, when the U.K. dominated global bond markets, the U.K.’s government debt was not always fully backed by its future surpluses, even after accounting for the seigniorage revenue from convenience yields. As predicted by theories of safe asset determination, investors concentrate extra fiscal capacity in a single country, the global safe asset supplier, based on relative macro fundamentals, and its debt growth may temporarily outstrip what is warranted by its own macro fundamentals. After the relative deterioration in U.K. fundamentals, due to the run-up in debt during WW-I and WW-II, bond investors focused exclusively on the U.K’s own macro fundamentals. Since then the U.K. debt has been fully backed by surpluses.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: E43; E62; G12


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
UK's historical debt levels (H63)fiscal capacity (E62)
UK's status as a safe asset supplier (F34)lower yields on UK government debt (H63)
UK's fiscal capacity (H69)ability to issue debt (H74)
post-WWII situation (P17)UK debt fully backed by future surpluses (H68)
US borrowing (H74)gap between debt and fiscal capacity (H69)
UK's historical context (N93)insights into US fiscal situation (H68)

Back to index