An Evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program Using Administrative Payroll Microdata

Working Paper: NBER ID: w29972

Authors: David Autor; David Cho; Leland D. Crane; Mita Goldar; Byron Lutz; Joshua K. Montes; William B. Peterman; David D. Ratner; Daniel Villar Vallenas; Ahu Yildirmaz

Abstract: The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a principal element of the fiscal stimulus enacted by Congress during the COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to assist small businesses to maintain employment and wages during the crisis. We use high-frequency administrative payroll data from ADP--one of the world’s largest payroll processing firms--to estimate the causal effect of the PPP on the evolution of employment at PPP-eligible firms relative to PPP-ineligible firms, where eligibility is determined by industry-specific firm-size cutoffs. We estimate that the PPP boosted employment at eligible firms by between 2 percent to 5 percent at its peak in mid-2020, with this effect waning to 0 to 3 percent throughout the remainder of the year. Employers retained an estimated additional 3.6 million jobs due to the PPP as of mid-May 2020, and 1.4 million jobs at the end of 2020. The implied cost per year of employment retained was $169,000 to $258,000, equal to 3.4 to 5.2 times median earnings.

Keywords: Paycheck Protection Program; employment; COVID-19; small businesses; fiscal stimulus

JEL Codes: E24; H25; H32; H81; J38


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) (H81)employment at eligible firms (L26)
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) (H81)retained jobs (J63)
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) (H81)employment increase relative to ineligible firms (J68)
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) (H81)employment effect waning over time (J29)
PPP take-up rate (H43)employment at eligible firms (L26)
PPP funding (H81)firms retaining employment (M51)

Back to index