Intimate Partner Violence and Income: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit

Working Paper: NBER ID: w29930

Authors: Resul Cesur; Nria Rodriguez-Planas; Jennifer Roff; David Simon

Abstract: We estimate the impact of an exogenous increase in income on the incidence and intensity of intimate partner violence (IPV). Using the National Crime Victimization Survey data from 1992 to 2000, we exploit time and family-size variation in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) by comparing IPV victimization of women with one or more children (our “treated” group) to that of women with no children (our comparison group) before and after OBRA-93. The OBRA-93 expansion reduces both reports of any physical or sexual assault and counts of physical or sexual assaults per 100 women surveyed, with the effects being strongest for those groups more likely to both experience IPV and be eligible for EITC: unmarried women and black women. If increased income (rather than changes in employment) is the only channel by which the EITC decreases IPV, an additional $1,000 of after-tax income decreases the incidence of physical and sexual violence of unmarried low-educated women by 9.73% and the intensity of physical and sexual violence by 21%. We explore potential mechanisms behind these findings.

Keywords: Intimate Partner Violence; Earned Income Tax Credit; EITC; Income; Causal Inference

JEL Codes: H2; I3; J08


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
EITC expansion (H31)decrease in intimate partner violence (IPV) (J12)
increase in after-tax income (H29)increase in women's economic independence (F63)
increase in women's economic independence (F63)decrease in intimate partner violence (IPV) (J12)
EITC expansion (H31)decrease in intensity of intimate partner violence (IPV) (J12)

Back to index