Should We Have Automatic Triggers for Unemployment Benefit Duration and How Costly Would They Be?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w29703

Authors: Gabriel Chodorow-Reich; Peter Ganong; Jonathan Gruber

Abstract: We model automatic trigger policies for unemployment insurance by simulating a weekly panel of individual labor market histories, grouped by state. We reach three conclusions: (i) policies designed to trigger immediately at the onset of a recession result in benefit extensions that occur in less sick labor markets than the historical average for benefit extensions; (ii) the ad hoc extensions in the 2001 and 2007-09 recessions in total cover a similar number of additional weeks as common proposals for automatic triggers, but concentrate coverage more in weaker labor markets; (iii) compared to ex post policy, the cost of common proposals for automatic triggers is close to zero.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: E24; E32; E62; H53; J65


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
automatic triggers (C69)benefit extensions in less sick labor markets (J49)
ad hoc extensions (B50)coverage in weaker labor markets (J68)
automatic triggers (C69)costs of UI systems (J65)

Back to index