Working Paper: NBER ID: w29411
Authors: Martin Kulldorff; Jay Bhattacharya
Abstract: In the United States, child support guidelines sometimes generate surprising and presumably unintentional child support amounts, especially in situations with extended visitation, shared parenting, and half-siblings. These are consequences of the ad-hoc mathematical formulas that are in common use to account for such situations. This paper provides ten such surprising examples from ten randomly selected states.\nA child support calculation framework is constructed that takes as inputs the subjective/normative decisions that the public and legislators must make regarding children's expenditures, the progressivity of the contributions between parents, and other matters. Our goal is to derive mathematical formulas for child support amounts that achieve those normative goals while satisfying basic desiderata such as supporting children in both of their families, equity between siblings, neutral medical decisions, and not requiring higher contributions from parents with a lower salary.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: I1; I18; J12; J13; K15; K36
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| mathematical formulas used for child support calculations (K36) | excessive payments that lead to parental debt and social issues (G51) |
| design features of child support guidelines (K36) | financial resources available to children (I22) |
| design of child support guidelines (K36) | negative socio-economic outcomes for families (J12) |