Working Paper: NBER ID: w29153
Authors: Lester R. Lusher; Winnie Yang; Scott E. Carrell
Abstract: Publishing takes a long time in economics. Consequently, many authors release “working” versions of their papers. Using data on the NBER working paper series, we show that the dissemination of economics research suffers from an overcrowding problem: An increase in the number of weekly released working papers on average reduces downloads, abstract views, and media attention for each paper. Subsequent publishing and citation outcomes are harmed as well. Furthermore, descriptive evidence on viewership and downloads suggests working papers significantly substitute for the dissemination function of publication. These results highlight inefficiencies in the dissemination of economic research even among the most exclusive working paper series and suggest large social losses due to the slow publication process.
Keywords: working papers; dissemination; economic research; publication lag
JEL Codes: I20; J01
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Number of weekly NBER working papers released (E01) | Abstract views (Y10) |
| Number of weekly NBER working papers released (E01) | Downloads (Y10) |
| Number of weekly NBER working papers released (E01) | Media attention (L82) |
| Number of weekly NBER working papers released (E01) | Publication prospects (Y90) |
| Number of weekly NBER working papers released (E01) | Citations (A14) |