Strategic or Confused Firms: Evidence from Missing Transactions in Uganda

Working Paper: NBER ID: w29059

Authors: Miguel Almunia; Jonas Hjort; Justine Knebelmann; Lin Tian

Abstract: Are firms sophisticated maximizers, or do they consistently make errors? Using transaction-level data from Ugandan value-added tax (VAT) returns, we show that sellers and buyers report different amounts 79% of the time, despite invoices being easily cross-checked. We estimate that 25% of firms are disadvantageous misreporters—they systematically misreport own sales and purchases such that their tax liability increases—while 75% are advantageous misreporters. Many firms—especially disadvantageous misreporters—fail to report imported inputs they themselves reported at Customs, increasing their VAT liability. On net, unilateral VAT misreporting cost Uganda about US$384 million in foregone 2013-2016 tax revenue

Keywords: VAT; Tax Reporting; Firm Behavior; Uganda

JEL Codes: D2; D9; H2; O1


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
transaction-level data from VAT returns (Y10)discrepancies in VAT reporting (H25)
discrepancies in VAT reporting (H25)tax liability (H20)
disadvantageous misreporters (D91)tax liability (H20)
advantageous misreporters (G14)tax liability (H20)
misreporting (C59)foregone tax revenue (H27)
advantageous misreporters (G14)foregone tax revenue (H27)
reporting category persistence (C59)firm behavior (D21)
firm characteristics (L20)likelihood of advantageous or disadvantageous reporting (C52)

Back to index