Working Paper: NBER ID: w28944
Authors: Mark Duggan; Craig Garthwaite; Adelina Yanyue Wang
Abstract: State governments face the classic “make or buy” decision for the provision of Medicaid services. Over the past two decades, the majority of states have outsourced the provision of social health insurance through Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) programs. These programs have been extensively studied in the literature – with little evidence of large positive or negative effects. However, most states initially allowed older and sicker enrollees to remain enrolled in the government run fee for service (FFS) programs. It is possible that these more fragile enrollees could have a different experience in managed care. In this paper we study California’s mandatory enrollment of the senior and persons with disabilities (SPD) population in MMC. We find this mandatory enrollment caused an increased use of the emergency department and transfers between hospitals. This was not simply a hassle cost for enrollees – we also estimate an increase in mortality for the affected population. These effects were strongest for the sickest enrollees – the types of enrollees that might be expected to have a different experience with managed care. Our results suggest the adverse impact of MMC varies by the enrollee health, which should inform the optimal outsourcing decision for governments.
Keywords: Medicaid; Managed Care; Health Insurance; Privatization; Health Outcomes
JEL Codes: H0; H1; I1; I10; I13; I18
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| mandatory MMC enrollment (I13) | increased ED visits (I19) |
| mandatory MMC enrollment (I13) | increased hospital transfers (I19) |
| mandatory MMC enrollment (I13) | increased mortality (I12) |
| sicker individuals (I12) | greater adverse outcomes from MMC (I12) |