Working Paper: NBER ID: w28921
Authors: Simon Jäger; Shakked Noy; Benjamin Schoefer
Abstract: We provide a comprehensive overview of codetermination, i.e., worker representation in firms’ governance and management. The available micro evidence points to zero or small positive effects of codetermination on worker and firm outcomes, and leaves room for moderate positive effects on productivity, wages, and job stability. Similarly, we present new country-level, general-equilibrium event studies of codetermination reforms between the 1960s and 2010s, finding no effects on aggregate economic outcomes or the quality of industrial relations. We offer three explanations of the institution’s limited impact. First, existing codetermination laws convey little authority to workers. Second, countries with codetermination laws have high baseline levels of informal worker voice. Third, codetermination laws may interact with other labor market institutions, such as union representation and collective bargaining. We close by discussing implications for recent codetermination proposals in the United States.
Keywords: Codetermination; Worker Representation; Labor Economics
JEL Codes: J08; K31; M1; M5
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| codetermination (J53) | wages (J31) |
| codetermination (J53) | voluntary separations (J63) |
| codetermination (J53) | involuntary separations (J63) |
| codetermination (J53) | job satisfaction (J28) |
| codetermination (J53) | productivity (O49) |
| codetermination (J53) | profitability (L21) |