When Does Patent Protection Spur Cumulative Research Within Firms?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w28880

Authors: Ashish Arora; Sharon Belenzon; Matt Marx; Dror Shvadron

Abstract: We estimate the effect of patent protection on follow-on investments in corporate scientific research. We exploit a new method for identifying an exogenous reduction in the protection a granted patent provides. Using data on public, research-active firms between 1990 and 2015, we find that firms decrease follow-on research after a reduction in patent protection, as measured by a drop in internal citations to an associated scientific article. This effect is stronger for smaller firms and in industries where patents are traded less frequently. Our findings are consistent with a stylized model whereby patent protection is a strategic substitute for commercialization capability. Our results imply that stronger patents encourage follow-on research, but also shift the locus of research from big firms toward smaller firms and startups. As patent protection has strengthened since the mid-1980s, our results help explain why the American innovation ecosystem has undergone a growing division of innovative labor, where startups become primary sources of new ideas.

Keywords: patent protection; research investments; cumulative research

JEL Codes: O30; O32; O34


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Firm size moderates the effect of reduction in patent protection (L25)Decreased follow-on research (D29)
Reduction in patent protection (O34)Shift of research locus from larger firms to smaller firms (L25)
Reduction in patent protection (O34)Decreased follow-on research (D29)

Back to index