Working Paper: NBER ID: w28190
Authors: Giovanni Maggi; Ralph Ossa
Abstract: Modern trade agreements no longer emphasize basic trade liberalization but instead focus on international policy coordination in a much broader sense. In this paper we introduce the emerging literature on the political economy of such deep integration agreements. We organize our discussion around three main points. First, the political conflict surrounding trade agreements is moving beyond the classic antagonism of exporter interests who gain from trade and import-competing interests who lose from trade. Second, there is a more intense popular backlash against deep integration agreements than there was against shallow integration agreements. And third, the welfare economics of trade agreements have become more complex, in the sense that the insight that "free trade is good" is no longer sufficient as a guide to evaluating the efficiency of international agreements.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: F13
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
political conflict surrounding trade agreements has evolved (F13) | traditional alignments of interests no longer apply (F55) |
more intense popular backlash against deep integration agreements (F15) | deeper encroachments on regulatory issues (G38) |
nature of agreements (L14) | public sentiment (E66) |
nature of trade agreements (F13) | difficulties in assessing their efficiency (D61) |