Working Paper: NBER ID: w28107
Authors: Ginger Zhe Jin; Hsienming Lien; Xuezhen Tao
Abstract: Since 2006, Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) has covered the full cost of baseline treatment in cardiac stents (bare-metal stents, BMS). Still, it requires patients to pay the incremental cost of more expensive treatments (drug-eluting stents, DES). Within this “top- up” design, we study how hospitals responded to a 26% cut of the NHI reimbursement rate in 2009. We find that hospitals that were more revenue reliant on cardiac patients increased BMS usage per stent patient by 0.05 or 6% but not DES usage. In addition, while the average of DES prices remains almost unchanged, minor teaching hospitals that were more revenue reliant on cardiac patients raised the DES price by 12.6%, and therefore could recoup at most 32.7% of the revenue loss from the NHI rate cut in 2009-2010. Overall, the rate cut was effective in reducing NHI expenditure without any substantial changes in patient outcomes, although some minor teaching hospitals made moral hazard adjustments in response.
Keywords: top-up design; health care cost; cardiac stent; moral hazard
JEL Codes: G22; I11; I18
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| NHI reimbursement cut (I18) | increased usage of BMS per stent patient (H74) |
| NHI reimbursement cut (I18) | raised prices of DES (P22) |
| raised prices of DES (P22) | reduction in the use of DES stents (O52) |
| NHI reimbursement cut (I18) | reduced NHI expenditure (H51) |
| increased usage of BMS (L97) | moral hazard adjustments in minor teaching hospitals (I18) |
| NHI reimbursement cut (I18) | differential impact based on hospital type (I14) |