Working Paper: NBER ID: w28015
Authors: Anthony M Diercks; Jonathan Rawls; Eric Sims
Abstract: This paper is one of the first to study the present-day properties of the gold standard in a quantitative model commonly used in central banks. We incorporate gold into an otherwise standard estimated New Keynesian model and compare the positive and normative implications of adopting a gold standard to other more commonly advocated policies. We show that under certain conditions, the gold standard is akin to a nominal GDP targeting framework and can at times be considered an improvement. However, unlike more conventional policies, the gold standard must react to shocks to the supply and demand for gold. We estimate the model for the post-2000 period using a novel dataset on the supply of gold and find that following a gold standard would result in dramatic increases in the volatilities of macroeconomic aggregates and a significant deterioration in household welfare. This is because the estimated shocks to gold supply and demand are significantly larger than for other more conventional aggregate shocks. In the end, what buries the gold standard turns out to be instability in the dynamics of gold itself.
Keywords: Gold Standard; Monetary Policy; New Keynesian Model; Welfare Analysis
JEL Codes: E31; E32; E42
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| gold standard (E42) | nominal GDP targeting (E19) |
| gold standard (E42) | output growth volatility (O49) |
| Taylor rule (E43) | output growth volatility (O49) |
| nominal GDP targeting (E19) | output growth volatility (O49) |
| gold standard (E42) | welfare loss (D69) |
| volatility of gold-specific shocks (E39) | output growth volatility (O49) |
| gold standard (E42) | instability of gold dynamics (C69) |