Deterrence Effects of Antifraud and Abuse Enforcement in Health Care

Working Paper: NBER ID: w27900

Authors: David H. Howard; Ian McCarthy

Abstract: Estimates of the benefits of antifraud enforcement in health care typically focus on direct monetary damages. Deterrence effects are acknowledged but unquantified. We evaluate the impact of a Department of Justice investigation of hospitals accused of billing Medicare for unnecessary implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) procedures on their use. Using 100% inpatient and outpatient procedure data from Florida, we estimate that the investigation caused a 22% decline in unnecessary ICD implantations. The present value of savings nationally over a 10 year period is $2.7 billion, nearly 10 times larger than the $280 million in settlements the Department of Justice recovered from hospitals. The investigation had a large and long-lasting effect on physician behavior, indicating the utility of antifraud enforcement as a tool for reducing wasteful medical care.

Keywords: antifraud enforcement; health care; Medicare; implantable cardiac defibrillator; False Claims Act

JEL Codes: I18; K42


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
decline in unnecessary ICD implantations (O14)savings to Medicare (H51)
DOJ investigation (L49)shift in physician behavior (I11)
DOJ investigation (L49)long-lasting deterrent effect of antifraud enforcement (G18)
decline in unnecessary ICD implantations (O14)change in trends of ICD procedures (O14)
DOJ investigation (L49)decline in unnecessary ICD implantations (O14)

Back to index