COVID-19 Changed Tastes for Safety-Net Programs

Working Paper: NBER ID: w27865

Authors: Alex Rees-Jones; John Dattoma; Amedeo Piolatto; Luca Salvadori

Abstract: In June 2020, we surveyed 2,516 Americans regarding their preferences for both short- and long-term expansions to government-provided healthcare and unemployment insurance programs. We find that support for such programs is positively associated with (a) COVID-19 deaths and infections in the respondent’s county, (b) the pandemic-induced change in the unemployment rate in the respondent’s county, and (c) survey elicitations of the respondent’s perceptions of COVID-19’s consequences. These associations persist when controlling for pre-COVID-19 political ideology and demographics. These results suggest that real or perceived exposure to COVID-19’s consequences has influenced support for expansions to the U.S. safety-net system.

Keywords: COVID-19; safety-net programs; government healthcare; unemployment insurance; policy preferences

JEL Codes: H2; H5


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
exposure to covid19's consequences (I12)support for long-term unemployment insurance expansions (J65)
exposure to covid19's consequences (I12)support for long-term expansions to government-provided healthcare (H51)
exposure to covid19's consequences (I12)preference for a bigger government (D72)
pre-covid19 political ideology and demographic variables (D72)support for long-term unemployment insurance expansions (J65)
pre-covid19 political ideology and demographic variables (D72)support for long-term expansions to government-provided healthcare (H51)
pre-covid19 political ideology and demographic variables (D72)preference for a bigger government (D72)

Back to index