Working Paper: NBER ID: w27774
Authors: Jess Fernández-Villaverde; Mark Koyama; Youhong Lin; Tuanhwee Sng
Abstract: Patterns of state formation have crucial implications for comparative economic development. Diamond (1997) famously argued that “fractured land” was responsible for China’s tendency toward political unification and Europe’s protracted polycentrism. We build a dynamic model with granular geographical information in terms of topographical features and the location of productive agricultural land to quantitatively gauge the effects of fractured land on state formation in Eurasia. We find that topography alone is sufficient, but not necessary, to explain polycentrism in Europe and unification in China. Differences in land productivity, in particular the existence of a core region of high land productivity in northern China, also deliver the same result. We discuss how our results map into observed historical outcomes, assess how robust our findings are, and analyze the predictions of our model for Africa and the Americas.
Keywords: state formation; political centralization; political polycentrism; geographical features; China; Europe
JEL Codes: H56; N40; P48
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| geographical features (Y91) | political outcomes (D72) |
| fractured land (Q15) | political fragmentation in Europe (N93) |
| fractured land (Q15) | unification in China (N95) |
| core region of high land productivity in Northern China (N95) | political unification (F55) |
| lack of core region of high land productivity in Europe (N93) | medium-sized polities (D72) |
| neutralizing effects of fractured land (Q24) | convergence of political trajectories of Europe and China (F55) |