Hiring as Exploration

Working Paper: NBER ID: w27736

Authors: Danielle Li; Lindsey R. Raymond; Peter Bergman

Abstract: This paper views hiring as a contextual bandit problem: to find the best workers over time, firms must balance “exploitation” (selecting from groups with proven track records) with “exploration” (selecting from under-represented groups to learn about quality). Yet modern hiring algorithms, based on “supervised learning” approaches, are designed solely for exploitation. Instead, we build a resume screening algorithm that values exploration by evaluating candidates according to their statistical upside potential. Using data from professional services recruiting within a Fortune 500 firm, we show that this approach improves the quality (as measured by eventual hiring rates) of candidates selected for an interview, while also increasing demographic diversity, relative to the firm's existing practices. The same is not true for traditional supervised learning based algorithms, which improve hiring rates but select far fewer Black and Hispanic applicants. In an extension, we show that exploration-based algorithms are also able to learn more effectively about simulated changes in applicant hiring potential over time. Together, our results highlight the importance of incorporating exploration in developing decision-making algorithms that are potentially both more efficient and equitable.

Keywords: Hiring; Contextual Bandit; Machine Learning; Diversity; Algorithmic Fairness

JEL Codes: D80; J20; M15; M51; O33


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
contextual bandit algorithm (C73)hiring rates of black and Hispanic candidates (J79)
contextual bandit algorithm (C73)diversity of candidates selected (D79)
contextual bandit algorithm (C73)quality of candidates selected (D79)
contextual bandit model (C73)hiring rates (J63)
updating supervised learning model (C52)hiring rates (J63)
traditional supervised learning models (C45)hiring rates of black and Hispanic candidates (J79)

Back to index