An Analytic Framework for Interpreting Investment Regressions in the Presence of Financial Constraints

Working Paper: NBER ID: w26898

Authors: Andrew B. Abel; Stavros Panageas

Abstract: A financial constraint that prevents access to external funds induces non-classical measurement error in average q as a proxy for unobservable marginal q. Unlike classical measurement error, this measurement error biases upward the coefficient on average q in a univariate regression of investment on average q. In a multiple regression of investment on average q and cash flow, the coefficient on cash flow is positive. The positive cash-flow coefficient indicates the presence of a financial constraint, but it does not indicate a shortage of liquidity to fund current investment. In addition, the coefficient on average q is biased downward.

Keywords: financial constraints; investment; average q; marginal q; measurement error

JEL Codes: E22; G33; G35


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
financial constraints (H60)optimal capital investment decisions (G31)
financial constraints (H60)firm value (G32)
firm value (G32)average q (C39)
firm value (G32)marginal q (C21)
financial constraints (H60)wedge between average q and marginal q (D43)
average q (C39)marginal q (C21)
cash flow coefficient (G31)conflation of impacts of financial constraints and expected future profitability (G41)
cash flow coefficient (G31)liquidity for current investment (G31)
financial constraints (H60)bias in estimated coefficients in investment regressions (C51)

Back to index