Working Paper: NBER ID: w26704
Authors: Stefanie Stantcheva
Abstract: This paper reviews recent advances in the study of dynamic taxation, considering three main approaches: the dynamic Mirrlees, the parametric Ramsey, and the sufficient statistics approaches. In the first approach, agents' heterogeneous abilities to earn income are private information and evolve stochastically over time. Dynamic taxes are not ex ante restricted and are set for redistribution and insurance considerations. Capital is taxed only in order to improve incentives to work. Human capital is optimally subsidized if it reduces post-tax inequality and risk on balance. The Ramsey approach specifies ex ante restricted tax instruments and adopts quantitative methods, which allows it to consider more complex and realistic economies. Capital taxes are optimal when age-dependent labor income taxes are not possible. The newer and tractable sufficient statistics approach derives robust tax formulas that depend on estimable elasticities and features of the income distributions. It simplifies the transitional dynamics thanks to a newly defined criterion, the “utility-based steady state approach” that prevents the government from exploiting sluggish responses in the short-run. Capital taxes are here based on the standard equity-efficiency trade-off.
Keywords: dynamic taxation; optimal tax policy; human capital; capital taxation
JEL Codes: H21; H23; H24; H25
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
dynamic taxes (H29) | economic equity (D63) |
dynamic taxes (H29) | individual welfare (I30) |
capital taxes (H24) | labor supply incentives (J20) |
human capital investments (J24) | inequality (D63) |
tax policy (H20) | distribution of economic resources (D30) |
optimal capital tax (H21) | social welfare outcomes (I38) |