Working Paper: NBER ID: w26636
Authors: Daniel R. Lafave; Evan D. Peet; Duncan Thomas
Abstract: The farm household model, in which decisions about production and consumption are made simultaneously, lies at the heart of many models of development. Empirically modelling these simultaneous choices is not straightforward. The vast majority of empirical studies assume that farm households behave as if markets are complete in which case decision-making simplifies to a recursive system where consumption choices can be treated as if they are made after all production decisions. Previous empirical tests of this assumption have relied on restrictions on production decisions. We develop a new approach to testing based on household consumption choices and implement the procedure using data from rural Indonesia. Relative to production-side tests, the consumption-based test is well-suited to identifying those farm households in any setting whose behavior is consistent with complete markets and those for whom the assumption is rejected. We find the recursion assumption is not rejected for larger farmers but is rejected for small farmers. The tests are straightforward to implement and the results of the tests provide new opportunities to identify the behaviors that households adopt in the face of incomplete markets.
Keywords: Farm households; Market completeness; Consumption-side tests; Agricultural economics; Rural development
JEL Codes: D52; O1; Q12
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Recursion assumption (C69) | Household behavior (D10) |
| Market access (L17) | Household behavior (D10) |
| Input prices (P22) | Demand ratios (R22) |
| Household types (R20) | Economic strategies (P19) |
| Larger farmers (Q12) | Complete markets behavior (D52) |
| Smaller farmers (Q12) | Incomplete markets behavior (D52) |