Government Guarantees and Bank Vulnerability During a Crisis: Evidence from an Emerging Market

Working Paper: NBER ID: w26564

Authors: Viral V. Acharya; Nirupama Kulkarni

Abstract: We analyze the performance of Indian banks during 2007–09 relative to their vulnerability to a crisis measured using pre-crisis data, in order to study the impact of government guarantees on bank performance during a crisis. Using bank branch-level regulatory data, we exploit geographic variation in the exposure to state-owned banks to show that vulnerable private sector bank branches in districts with greater exposure to state-owned banks experienced deposit withdrawals and shortening of deposit maturity. In contrast, nearby vulnerable state-owned bank branches grew their deposit base and increased loan advances but with poorer ex-post performance of loans. Our evidence suggests that access to stronger government guarantees during aggregate crises allows even vulnerable state-owned banks to access and extend credit cheaply despite their under-performance, and this renders private sector banks especially vulnerable to crises.

Keywords: government guarantees; bank performance; financial crisis; emerging markets; India

JEL Codes: G01; G21; G28; H1


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
government guarantees (H81)deposit withdrawals from vulnerable private sector banks (G21)
government guarantees (H81)increase in deposit base for vulnerable state-owned banks (O16)
1 pp increase in MES (E49)705 pp increase in realized stock market returns for state-owned banks (O16)
1 pp increase in MES (E49)685 pp decline in stock returns for private sector banks (G21)
deposit outflows from vulnerable private sector banks (F65)contraction in lending (G21)
increased lending by vulnerable state-owned banks (F65)deterioration in performance of loans (G21)
government guarantees (H81)negative spillovers on the private banking sector (F65)
negative spillovers on the private banking sector (F65)declines in economic activity in districts with deposit outflows (E44)

Back to index