Experimentation and Startup Performance: Evidence from AB Testing

Working Paper: NBER ID: w26278

Authors: Rembrand Koning; Sharique Hasan; Aaron Chatterji

Abstract: Recent work argues that experimentation is the appropriate framework for entrepreneurial strategy. We investigate this proposition by exploiting the time-varying adoption of A/B testing technology, which has drastically reduced the cost of experimentally testing business ideas. This paper provides the first evidence of how digital experimentation affects the performance of a large sample of high-technology startups using data that tracks their growth, technology use, and product launches. We find that, despite its prominence in the business press, relatively few firms have adopted A/B testing. However, among those that do, we find increased performance on several critical dimensions, including page views and new product features. Furthermore, A/B testing is positively related to tail outcomes, with younger ventures failing faster and older firms being more likely to scale. Firms with experienced managers also derive more benefits from A/B testing. Our results inform the emerging literature on entrepreneurial strategy and how digitization and data-driven decision-making are shaping strategy.

Keywords: AB Testing; Startup Performance; Entrepreneurial Strategy

JEL Codes: M13; M2


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
AB testing adoption (C91)page views (Y10)
AB testing adoption (C91)product launches (M31)
AB testing adoption (C91)likelihood of extreme outcomes (C46)

Back to index