Can Simple Psychological Interventions Increase Preventive Health Investment?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w25731

Authors: Johannes Haushofer; Anett John; Kate Orkin

Abstract: Behavioral constraints may explain part of low demand for preventive health products. We test the effects of two light-touch psychological interventions on water chlorination and related health and economic outcomes using a randomized controlled trial among 3750 women in rural Kenya. One intervention encourages participants to visualize alternative realizations of the future; one builds participants' ability to make concrete plans. Both interventions include information on health benefits of chlorination. After twelve weeks, both interventions increase the share of households who chlorinate drinking water and reduce child diarrhea episodes. Analysis of mechanisms suggests both interventions increase self-efficacy—beliefs about one's ability to achieve desired outcomes—as well as the salience of chlorination. They do not differentially affect beliefs and knowledge about chlorination (compared to a group who receive only information), nor affect lab measures of time preferences or planning ability. Results suggest simple psychological interventions can increase use of preventive health technologies.

Keywords: psychological interventions; preventive health; water chlorination; child health

JEL Codes: D91; I12; O12


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Self-efficacy and salience (D91)Chlorination behavior (Q52)
Self-efficacy and salience (D91)Child diarrhea episodes (I19)
Visualization intervention (Y10)Chlorination behavior (Q52)
Visualization intervention (Y10)Child diarrhea episodes (I19)
Planning intervention (O21)Chlorination behavior (Q52)
Planning intervention (O21)Child diarrhea episodes (I19)
Active control group (C90)Chlorination behavior (Q52)
Active control group (C90)Child diarrhea episodes (I19)

Back to index