Infringing Use as a Path to Legal Consumption: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Working Paper: NBER ID: w25453

Authors: Hong Luo; Julie Holland Mortimer

Abstract: Copyright infringement may result from frictions preventing legal consumption, but may also reveal demand. Motivated by this fact, we run a field experiment in which we contact firms that are caught infringing on expensive digital images. Emails to all firms include a link to the licensing page of the infringed image; for treated firms, we add links to a significantly cheaper licensing site. Making infringers aware of the cheaper option leads to a fourteen-fold increase in the ex-post licensing rate. Two additional experimental interventions are designed to reduce search costs for (i) price and (ii) product information. Both interventions-immediate price comparison and recommendation of images similar to those infringed-have large positive effects. Our results highlight the importance of mitigating user costs in small-value transactions.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: O30; O33; O34


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Increasing awareness of a cheaper licensing option (L17)Increase in licensing rate among infringing users (D45)
Awareness of cheaper microstock licensing site (D49)Increase in licensing rate from 0.17% to 2.63% (D45)
Recommending similar images (Y90)Increase in probability of licensing a microstock image (D45)
Providing premium price information (D49)Increase in licensing rate (D45)
Reducing search costs (D83)Increase in licensing rates (D45)
Infringing use provides valuable information about demand (D45)Increase in legal consumption (K49)

Back to index