Wages and the Value of Nonemployment

Working Paper: NBER ID: w25230

Authors: Simon Jäger; Benjamin Schoefer; Samuel G. Young; Josef Zweimüller

Abstract: Nonemployment is often posited as a worker’s outside option in wage setting models such as bargaining and wage posting. The value of nonemployment is therefore a key determinant of wages. We measure the wage effect of changes in the value of nonemployment among initially employed workers. Our quasi-experimental variation in the value of nonemployment arises from four large reforms of unemployment insurance (UI) benefit levels in Austria. We document that wages are insensitive to UI benefit changes: point estimates imply a wage response of less than $0.01 per $1.00 UI benefit increase, and we can reject sensitivities larger than $0.03. The insensitivity holds even among workers with low wages and high predicted unemployment duration, and among job switchers and recently unemployed workers. The insensitivity of wages to the nonemployment value presents a puzzle to the widely used Nash bargaining model, which predicts a sensitivity of $0.24–$0.48. Our evidence supports wage-setting models that insulate wages from the value of nonemployment.

Keywords: wages; unemployment insurance; nonemployment; labor economics; Nash bargaining

JEL Codes: D43; D83; E24; H0; H22; H55; J0; J2; J3; J30; J31; J41; J42; J5; J6; J64; J65; M5; M52


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
UI benefits increase (J65)wages increase (J31)
wages sensitivity to UI benefits (J65)wage response < 0.01 (J31)
predicted nonemployment duration (C41)wage sensitivity (J31)
UI benefits increase (J65)wage sensitivity null result (J31)
wage stickiness (J31)wage insensitivity (J31)
collective bargaining effects (J52)wage insensitivity (J31)

Back to index