Mismatch and Assimilation

Working Paper: NBER ID: w24960

Authors: Ping Wang; Tsznga Wong; Chong K. Yip

Abstract: Income disparity across countries has been large and widening over time. We develop a tractable model where factor requirements in production technology do not necessarily match a country's factor input profile. Appropriate assimilation of frontier technologies balances such multi-dimensional factor input-technology mismatch, thus mitigating the efficiency loss. This yields a new measure for endogenous TFP, entailing a novel trade-off between a country's income level and income growth that depends critically on the assimilation ability and the factor input mismatch. Our baseline model accounts for 80%-92% of the global income variation over the past 50 years. The widening of mismatch and heterogeneity in the assimilation ability account for 41% and 20% of the global growth variation, whereas physical capital accounts for about one third with human capital largely inconsequential. In particular, about 30% of the output growth in miracle Asian economies comes from narrowing the gap arisen from mismatch, and 94% of the growth stagnation in trapped African economies due to the widening mismatch. A country may fall into a middle-income trap after a factor advantage reversal that changes the pattern of mismatch.

Keywords: income disparity; technology assimilation; economic growth; factor input mismatch

JEL Codes: D90; E23; O40


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
factor input-technology mismatch (O33)income disparities (I24)
technology assimilation (O33)efficiency loss from mismatch (H21)
technology assimilation (O33)productivity (O49)
productivity (O49)economic growth (O49)
narrowing the mismatch (C78)output growth in miracle economies (O49)
widening mismatch (I24)growth stagnation in trapped economies (O11)
reversal of factor advantages (F16)middle-income trap (O11)

Back to index