Working Paper: NBER ID: w24880
Authors: Katharine G. Abraham; Ashley Amaya
Abstract: The Current Population Survey (CPS) is the source of official U.S. labor force statistics. The wording of the CPS employment questions may not always cue respondents to include informal work in their responses, especially when providing proxy reports about other household members. In a survey experiment conducted using a sample of Mechanical Turk respondents, additional probing identified a substantial amount of informal work activity not captured by the CPS employment questions, both among those with no employment and among those categorized as employed based on answers to the CPS questions. Among respondents providing a proxy report for another household member, the share identifying additional work was systematically greater among those receiving a detailed probe that offered examples of types of informal work than among those receiving a simpler global probe. Similar differences between the effects of the detailed and the global probe were observed when respondents answered for themselves only among those who had already reported multiple jobs. The findings suggest that additional probing could improve estimates of employment and multiple job holding in the CPS and other household surveys, but that how the probe is worded is likely to be important.
Keywords: informal work; employment statistics; survey methodology
JEL Codes: J21; J46
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
probing method (C99) | identification of informal work (J46) |
detailed probe (Y50) | amount of informal work reported (J46) |
proxy reports (C59) | increase in reported informal work (J46) |
underreporting of informal work (J46) | labor force measures (J21) |
question wording (C83) | uncovering informal work activity (J46) |