Insurance Without Commitment: Evidence from the ACA Marketplaces

Working Paper: NBER ID: w24668

Authors: Rebecca Diamond; Michael J. Dickstein; Timothy McQuade; Petra Persson

Abstract: We study the dynamics of participation and health care consumption in the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplaces. Unlike other health insurance contexts, we find individuals commonly drop coverage midyear–roughly 30% of enrollees exit within nine months of sign-up. While covered, dropouts spend more on health care than in the months before sign-up or after exit. We model the consequences of drop-out on equilibrium premiums and consumer welfare. While dropouts generate a type of adverse selection, the welfare effect from their participation is ambiguous and depends on the relative costs per month of part-year vs. full-year enrollees. In our empirical setting, we find that imposing a penalty that incentivizes participation for at least 3.5 months would lower premium levels and improve overall consumer welfare.

Keywords: Affordable Care Act; health insurance; dropout behavior; consumer welfare

JEL Codes: H4; H51; I13; L1


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
dropout behavior (I21)consumer welfare (D69)
dropout behavior (I21)insurance premiums (G52)
dropout behavior (I21)adverse selection (D82)
adverse selection (D82)insurance premiums (G52)
dropout behavior (I21)health care spending (H51)
insurance premiums (G52)consumer welfare (D69)
dropout behavior (I21)market efficiency (G14)
penalty for maintaining insurance for 36 months (G52)premiums (G22)
penalty for maintaining insurance for 36 months (G52)consumer welfare (D69)

Back to index